I remember vividly the moment of revelation at the Gateway Conservation Alliance meeting in July 2023, when the leadership unexpectedly confessed that their publicly voiced environmental concerns were merely a facade to oppose the location of our gravel pit project. This admission was a jolt, revealing that the arguments about wildlife preservation and water quality were strategically deployed to rally community opposition against the gravel pit. It was a stark exposure of how genuine environmental advocacy could be twisted for ulterior motives. See our conversation from the meeting below.
“Would you guys consider a pit on the east/south side somewhere on your upper ranch versus pit on your lower farm fields? Would it be considered as an alternative? We could turn our negative effort in fighting this into a positive one to support it.”
Gateway Conservation Alliance Leadership
“What bothers me about doing a gravel pit on our upper place is that we can chuck all your environmental concerns out the window because that’s carbon sequestering grass land that’s being used as a giant filtration system, closer to the river and it’s an established elk migratory area.”
Bayard Black
“Go ahead, It can be completely restored. Call us hypocrites, call us whatever you like, we’re all NIMBY’s and we’re all hypocrites, let’s get that behind us. What we’re saying is that if you do it up there, we can help and put whatever force and might we have behind it. It would be easier to work with you than against you. If you and your family would substitute one for the other, then we could get behind your pit and push it forward.”
Gateway Conservation Alliance Leadership
Disheartened and disillusioned, I resolved that this meeting would be my last with the Alliance. There’s a profound betrayal in discovering that issues as critical as environmental conservation are being manipulated to serve hidden agendas. My frustration isn’t directed at my neighbors, many of whom were misled by these deceptive tactics, but rather at the orchestrators of this charade—well-organized, well-funded groups who prioritize their interests over communal well-being and environmental integrity.
I urge my neighbors to approach this issue with a healthy skepticism and critical thinking. Yes, the process of gravel pit reclamation will take time; meaningful progress often does. Instead of siding with those who have openly admitted to hypocrisy, I invite the community to consider supporting our project, which promises substantial environmental benefits for our area. Let’s choose to invest in long-term environmental health rather than be swayed by short-term deceit.
Damn, the writing in the Lessons section and blog was fantastic! Did you write that, Bayard?
I’m still seeing this situation as a great cautionary tale for anyone looking to move into environmental activism. I’d tell my own group that making every construction project a costly battle only hurts the most urgent environmental causes, giving destructive developers a way to smear their opposition by citing these unsavory incidents.
Thank you Morgan! I dedicated significant time and effort to creating this site, and I found great joy in writing the content. As a staunch advocate for environmental protection, I am compelled to challenge those who manipulate environmental causes for ulterior motives. I advise your group to rigorously gather specific evidence to substantiate your concerns, gain a comprehensive understanding of the land’s current state, and critically assess the motives and vision of developers. By doing so, we can pursue development projects that not only respect but actively improve the environment.
Pingback: Wolves in Sheep's Clothing - Gateway Rocks